Boston Convention Creates Kerry Democrats
After his 50-minute speech last night, John Kerry's performance mostly received reviews that reflected what
the commentator wanted the public to believe about the speech. Surprising to those who listened was Pat
Buchanan, the darling of the populist right, who said he was moved by the speech and had he not known
Kerry's track record in the Senate would think seriously about backing the Massachusetts senator. Strength,
respect and help seemed to be the slogan all awash with optimism. The whining wing of the party was no
where in sight. The Harry Truman faction had returned home.
Such Democrats believe that America is, indeed, a special nation with a special mission in the world. Like
their Republican patriot fellow citizens, they truly believe that America is the greatest nation on the face of
the earth (though every few have seen each and every other country). Unlike the patriotic right, though,
Truman/Kerry Democrats aren't impressed with the competition. To them, being richer than Ghana, freer than
Saudi Arabia and more resolute than France isn't much of a challenge. To them, the only measure that is
appropriate for America is pitting its actions against its ideals. Sometimes, the nation does come up short,
and being best in that case just isn't good enough.
Sometimes, the nationalism that says "my country right or wrong" can't understand the patriotism that says,
"my country right or I'll fix it." Such patriots in the past looked at the Jim Crow laws and at the "all men are
created equal" line in the Declaration of Independence and decided being best wouldn't do. Such patriots
wonder why in a fight against totalitarianism it was necessary to support "friendly" dictatorships against
democratic elements in the same country. Such Americans, while labeled "Un-American" at times, are truly
the best of the breed.
Nor do the Democrats have a monopoly on this virtue. The Republican party was founded by those who
couldn't reconcile the "shining city on the hill" with chattel slavery. The first President Roosevelt proclaimed
To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by
the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public. Patriotism means to stand by the country [the Constitution?]. It does not mean to stand by the
President or any other public official save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It
is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to
the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country.
And Senator John McCain, who is more than a media darling, has a largely unsung record of supporting
Native Americans against a government that more often than not would rather they just went away.
What was missing from the Boston Convention was the culture of victimhood. Finally, the Democrats got it.
Americans don't want a hand out, but sometimes need a helping hand. The Bush election campaign will have
to work hard to diffuse this, but painting the Democrats as the some old thing has worked before, and they
will hope that it works again. And it might in 2004, but it seems that the party in 2008 will look more than the
party of 1948 than 1968 -- and that is progress.
© Copyright 2004 by
The Kensington Review, J. Myhre, Editor. No part of this publication may be reproduced without
written consent.
Home
|
|
|