Unsleight of Hand

12 June 2006



Congress Drops Permanent Base Ban in War Appropriation

The talk about getting US troops out of Iraq is largely just talk. The Republican Congress just passed a $94.5 billion emergency spending bill, which includes $65.8 billion to continue waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both chambers passed language that would have prevented the Pentagon from spending any of it on permanent bases in Iraq. In the version that came out of conference committee, that restriction is gone.

In the original Senate version, the funding came with a string that would prevent the Pentagon from establishing “permanent United States military bases in Iraq,” or exercising “United States control over the oil infrastructure or oil resources of Iraq.” The House version spoke of prohibiting spending any of the funds for a military basing rights agreement with Iraq. In short, left to their own devices, both chambers mean it when they say “bring the troops home.”

When it came time to reconcile the two versions of the bill, though, the White House started twisting arms. According to Reuters,

Senate aides said Republican staffers removed the provisions from the bills before House and Senate negotiators convened this week in a late-night work session to write a compromise spending bill.

Wisconsin Rep. David Obey, the senior Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, tried to reinsert the language, but it was opposed by Rep. Jim Kolbe, the Arizona Republican responsible for foreign affairs portions of the spending bill.
Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-CA) said, “The House and Senate went on record opposing permanent bases, but now the Republicans are trying to sneak them back in the middle of the night.” Why? This is not a dispute between the executive and legislative over constitutional powers. If the White House has no intention of establishing permanent bases in Iraq, the restriction is meaningless. One does not object to a law that prohibits things one had no intention of doing. A more plausible reason for the sudden change, then, is the desire on the part of the White House to keep US forces on US bases in Iraq – permanently.

© Copyright 2006 by The Kensington Review, Jeff Myhre, PhD, Editor. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent. Produced using Fedora Linux.

Home
Google
WWW Kensington Review







Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More