Losing the Base

6 November 2006



Army Times Calls for Rumsfeld’s Resignation Again

As the website says, the Army Times is part of the Military Times Media group, consisting of the Army Times, Navy Times, Air Force Times and Marine Corps Times. Owned by Gannet, they are probably the papers most focused on the needs of the folks in uniform, from R&R in their travel section, to information on living on a new base; the writers’ main purpose is to address the special information needs of Americans in uniform. This morning, all four papers ran an editorial calling for the replacement of Field Marshal Donald von Rumsfeld as US Secretary of Defense.

Editor Robert Hodierne told CNN that the paper had already demanded that Field Marshal von Rumsfeld quit over Abu Ghraib, and it is a matter of public record that the president declined to accept the resignation offer Mr. Rumsfeld made. Taking the blame for the prison-torture scandal was the right thing to do as a matter of ministerial responsibility. At the same time, the same holds true for the war, and Mr. Rumsfeld has failed to take the heat for his failing (or failed) war plan.

The editorial in question reads, in part,

For two years, American sergeants, captains and majors training the Iraqis have told their bosses that Iraqi troops have no sense of national identity, are only in it for the money, don’t show up for duty and cannot sustain themselves. Meanwhile, colonels and generals have asked their bosses for more troops. Service chiefs have asked for more money. And all along, Rumsfeld has assured us that things are well in hand. Now, the president says he’ll stick with Rumsfeld for the balance of his term in the White House. This is a mistake. It is one thing for the majority of Americans to think Rumsfeld has failed. But when the nation’s current military leaders start to break publicly with their defense secretary, then it is clear that he is losing control of the institution he ostensibly leads.
The papers are right. Indeed, it’s one thing when The Nation slams the Secretary of Defense, or the Washington Post, or even the Washington Times. The Military Times group is made up of the hometown papers of the services, and they are saying “we don’t want to follow him.” The best parallel would be a company internal newsletter saying the VP for Marketing and Sales has to go. For 200+ years, the US military personnel have accepted (gladly) the subordination of their power to that of the elected civilian government. There is no doubt they will continue in that way ad infinitum.

However, they are also citizens who deserve a responsive and responsible government. If they don’t want to follow the Field Marshal because their professional experience says he isn’t the man to lead, surely the civilians should acknowledge that change is needed. Mr. Bush wants to keep his Secretary of Defense, but it is almost certain that two more years of this will shatter morale among the troops and undermine the ability of the military to do its job – which is protecting America, not propping up puppets in Baghdad.

© Copyright 2006 by The Kensington Review, Jeff Myhre, PhD, Editor. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent. Produced using Fedora Linux.


Home
Google
WWW Kensington Review







Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More