Pretending

9 July 2008



Google
WWW Kensington Review

G-8 Leaders Paper over Environmental Cracks

The G-8 Summit in Japan issued some environmental drivel in the final communiqué that will allow the rich countries of the world to do very little on greenhouse gas emissions until some of the rapidly growing economies (e.g., India and China) do likewise. To which these countries will reply, “when we have your standard of living, sign us up.” Indeed, some of those countries met with the G-8 summiteers and said more needed to be done than the communiqué suggested.

As a sample of diplomatic brilliance in the face of discord, one can only admire the Sir Humphrey Appleby tone of:

We seek to share with all Parties to the UNFCCC the vision of, and together with them to consider and adopt in the UNFCCC negotiations, the goal of achieving at least 50% reduction of global emissions by 2050, recognizing that this global challenge can only be met by a global response, in particular, by the contributions from all major economies, consistent with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Substantial progress toward such a long-term goal requires, inter alia, in the near-term, the acceleration of the deployment of existing technologies, and in the medium- and long-term, will depend on the development and deployment of low-carbon technologies in ways that will enable us to meet our sustainable economic development and energy security objectives. In this regard, we emphasize the importance and urgency of adopting appropriate measures to stimulate development and deployment of innovative technologies and practices.
This is why the world continues to heat up. This means nothing more than somehow the world needs to do something 40 years out. Seeming to realize their role, Mexico, Brazil, China, India and South Africa issued a statement before they had their chat with the others that said, “It is essential that developed countries take the lead in achieving ambitious and absolute greenhouse gas emission reductions.” They suggested that the developed nations cut greenhouse gas emissions by 25-40% of 1990 levels in the next 12 years. Of course, the Bush administration opposes interim targets. Apparently, the White House believes it can all be done at the last minute, sort of like planning the administration of Iraq-Nam after the war.

Kim Carstensen of the World Wildlife Foundation’s Global Climate Initiative nailed it saying, “If after a year’s work all you have is a ‘shared vision’ instead of ‘seriously considering,’ it’s pretty pathetic.” Time to shut down the G-8.

© Copyright 2008 by The Kensington Review, Jeff Myhre, PhD, Editor. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent. Produced using Fedora Linux.

Kensington Review Home